Details coming soon.

Presented by

“It is easier to judge the mind of a man by his questions rather than his answers.” — Pierre-Marc-Gaston, duc de Lévis (1764-1830)

We like answers. We like to know them and to give them. Sometimes we want others to think we are smart or knowledgeable, so we jump to give answers rather than ask questions.  And the questions we do ask are sometimes based more on our personal assumptions and biases than they are about getting to the real answer.

Skeptical thinking is more about asking good questions than knowing good answers. In this interactive workshop, we will practice methods for posing questions that lead to better understanding and new ideas, while avoiding bias and hasty assumptions.

Presented by

Details coming soon.

Presented by

Our world is full of strange mysteries; ghosts, monsters, UFOs, alleged miracles, and so on. In this workshop, the dynamic duo of Ben Radford and Kenny Biddle, two experienced investigators, will share some of the techniques they employ to investigate and solve these extraordinary mysteries. They’ll discuss tips and techniques for investigating, and do a deep-dive into a few case files that demonstrate how these techniques were instrumental in breaking the case and solving the mystery. The workshop will wrap up with a Q&A session, giving attendees an opportunity to pick the brains of the hosts.

Presented by

Details coming soon.

Presented by

It is imperative to understand why we fall for bullshit if we are ever to effectively overcome it. I will discuss the cognitive science of human beliefs with a specific focus on political fake news and new-age woo (“pseudo-profound bullshit”). I propose that the all-too-human propensity to reflexively rely on our gut feelings and intuitions in lieu of more analytic thinking processes is the key to understanding why we fall for bullshit.

Presented by

An insider-outsider look at the Facilitated Communication movement—how it works, who really benefits, why critical reviews have not stopped its progress, and what we can do about it.

Presented by

I lead a team of scientists focused on brain theory, specifically, how the neocortex works. In the past few years we have made dramatic progress on this problem. In this talk I will give an overview of what we have learned and propose how brain theory might impact the future of AI and robotics. I will end with a discussion of what can go wrong, how the brain can form false beliefs and why it doesn’t always behave rationally.

All of our work is published in open access peer-reviewed journals. You can find links to these and other resources at www.numenta.com.

Presented by

Human-caused climate change represents arguably the greatest threat we face as a civilization. Efforts to attack and deny the scientific evidence have constituted a major impediment to action over the past two decades. At a time when we appear to be moving past outright denial of the problem, another obstacle has emerged on the scene: Doomist framing that exaggerates the threat in such a way as to make catastrophic changes seem unavoidable. Such framing can lead us down the very same path of inaction as outright denial of the problem. It is important, in the end, to emphasize both urgency AND agency in climate change communication efforts.

Presented by

We now live in a world where even a seemingly obvious fact of our existence is put into question.

What happens when a group of skeptics (the Center for Inquiry Investigations Group) meets a group of deniers (Flat Earthers) to square-off about the shape of our planet? And how is it even possible that the number of people who actually believe the earth to be flat is growing?

James Underdown will take us on a journey to the Salton Sea with National Geographic Explorer to see if the spheroidal shape of the earth can be demonstrated through simple means.

Presented by

The most awarded mentalist in history is back at CSICon! Described as the “Cream of the Crop” when it comes to entertainers, Banachek is undisputed as the world’s greatest mindreader. Astounding audiences across the globe, his talents are so incredible that he is the only mentalist ever to prove to scientists that he possesses “authentic ‘psychic powers’.” Luckily Banachek is also a skeptic and debunker of charlatans.

Join him for a show full of mind reading, predictions, and telekinesis. You may even learn the skills of a mentalist yourself!

Presented by

In this talk, Dr. Lilienfeld will examine recent psychological theorizing and research, including some from his laboratory, on the poorly understood construct of intellectual (epistemic) humility, which refers to the extent to which individuals are aware of their own cognitive fallibility, including their propensity toward biases. He will discuss the potential implications of intellectual humility for political and religious extremism and polarization, as well as for scientific and unscientific thinking. He will also discuss how intellectual humility may help to elucidate the differences between healthy and pathological skepticism and examine its implications for the skeptical movement writ large.

Presented by

Dating back to Darwin himself, the “argument from poor design” holds that examples of suboptimal structure/function demonstrate that nature does not have a designer. Perhaps surprisingly, human beings have more than our share of quirks and glitches. Besides speaking to our shared ancestry, these evolutionary “seams” reveal interesting things about our past. This offers a unique accounting of our evolutionary legacy and sheds new light on how to live in better harmony with our bodies, in all their flawed glory.

Presented by

13-year old Bailey Harris is an author, speaker, and advocate for freethought and human rights. Her Stardust series of science books for young readers are at the core of her mission to inspire a love of science and a sense of wonder about the universe  Bailey’s story of growing up as a secular child in a highly religious community is both touching and inspirational and her passion for science is infectious.

Presented by

Naturopaths have defined their brand of medicine using a set of “healing” principles that sound pleasant, but really describe an archaic and sometimes twisted understanding of medicine. Having been a former naturopathic “doctor,” I can say that the overwhelming majority of naturopathic care relies extensively on dubious alternative therapies, rather than established protocols based on medical and scientific research. When it comes to naturopathy, “nature” always trumps the oath to do no harm. Join me for a deconstruction of naturopathy’s defining principles and what to do about the growing trend of natural medicine.

Presented by

This lunch includes a panel discussion and an opportunity to dine with Richard Dawkins, Julia Sweeney, and other guests to be announced.

Presented by

For several decades, I have been manufacturing memories in unsuspecting minds. Sometimes this involves changing details of events that someone actually experienced. Other times it involves planting entire memories for events that never happened – “rich false memories.” People can be led to believe that they did things that would have been rather implausible. They can be led to falsely believe that they had experiences that would have been emotional or traumatic had they actually happened. False memories, like true ones, also have consequences for people, affecting later thoughts, intentions, and behaviors. Can we tell true memories from false ones? In several studies, I created false memories in the minds of people and then compared them to true memories…  Once planted, the false memories look very much like true memories – in terms of behavioral characteristics, emotionality, and neural signatures. If false memories can be so readily planted in the mind, do we need to think about “regulating” this mind technology? And what do these pseudomemories say about the nature of memory itself?

Presented by

The Sunday Morning Papers session recognizes new voices and new ideas and showcases them in the spotlight of the CSICon stage. If you have had success in communicating scientific skepticism, teaching critical thinking, combating pseudoscience, or furthering skepticism in some new and significant way, we want to hear from you! More Information & Submission Instructions ›

Presented by